The Royal Society
Browse

Supplementary material from "The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?"

Posted on 2023-01-27 - 03:59
Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.

CITE THIS COLLECTION

DataCite
3 Biotech
3D Printing in Medicine
3D Research
3D-Printed Materials and Systems
4OR
AAPG Bulletin
AAPS Open
AAPS PharmSciTech
Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg
ABI Technik (German)
Academic Medicine
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Psychiatry
Academic Questions
Academy of Management Discoveries
Academy of Management Journal
Academy of Management Learning and Education
Academy of Management Perspectives
Academy of Management Proceedings
Academy of Management Review
or
Select your citation style and then place your mouse over the citation text to select it.

SHARE

email

Usage metrics

Royal Society Open Science

AUTHORS (24)

Merle-Marie Pittelkow
Sarahanne M. Field
Peder M. Isager
Anna E. van’t Veer
Thomas Anderson
Scott N. Cole
Tomáš Dominik
Roger Giner-Sorolla
Sebahat Gok
Tom Heyman
Marc Jekel
Timothy J. Luke
David B. Mitchell
Rik Peels
Rosina Pendrous
Samuel Sarrazin
Jacob M. Schauer
Eva Specker
Ulrich S. Tran
Marek A. Vranka
need help?