Supplementary material from "Institutional incentives for the evolution of committed cooperation: ensuring participation is as important as enhancing compliance"
Posted on 07.03.2022 - 14:05
Both conventional wisdom and empirical evidence suggest that arranging a prior commitment or agreement before an interaction takes place enhances the chance of reaching mutual cooperation. Yet it is not clear what mechanisms might underlie the participation in and compliance with such a commitment, especially when participation is costly and non-compliance can be profitable. Here, we develop a theory of participation and compliance with respect to an explicit commitment formation process and to institutional incentives where individuals, at first, decide whether or not to join a cooperative agreement to play a one-shot social dilemma game. Using a mathematical model, we determine whether and when participating in a costly commitment, and complying with it, is an evolutionary stable strategy, resulting in high levels of cooperation. We show that, given a sufficient budget for providing incentives, rewarding of commitment compliant behaviours better promotes cooperation than punishment of non-compliant ones. Moreover, by sparing part of this budget for rewarding those willing to participate in a commitment, the overall level of cooperation can be significantly enhanced for both reward and punishment. Finally, the presence of mistakes in deciding to participate favours evolutionary stability of commitment compliance and cooperation.
CITE THIS COLLECTION
Han, The Anh (2022): Supplementary material from "Institutional incentives for the evolution of committed cooperation: ensuring participation is as important as enhancing compliance". The Royal Society. Collection. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5880182.v1
Select your citation style and then place your mouse over the citation text to select it.
Read the peer-reviewed publication
The Anh Han