The Royal Society
Browse

Supplementary material from "Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth"

Version 2 2019-06-14, 12:00
Version 1 2019-06-04, 10:41
Posted on 2019-06-14 - 12:00
Persistent interest lies in gender inequality, especially with regard to the favouring of sons over daughters. Economists are concerned with how privilege is transmitted across generations, and anthropologists have long studied sex-biased inheritance norms. There has, however, been no focused cross-cultural investigation of how parent–offspring correlations in wealth vary by offspring sex. We estimate these correlations for 38 wealth measures, including somatic and relational wealth, from 15 populations ranging from hunter–gatherers to small-scale farmers. Although small sample sizes limit our statistical power, we find no evidence of ubiquitous male bias, at least as inferred from comparing parent–son and parent–daughter correlations. Rather we find wide variation in signatures of sex bias, with evidence of both son and daughter-biased transmission. Further, we introduce a model that helps pinpoint the conditions under which simple mid-point parent–offspring wealth correlations can reveal information about sex-biased parental investment. Our findings are relevant to the study of female-biased kinship by revealing just how little normative descriptors of kinship systems, such as patrilineal inheritance, capture intergenerational correlations in wealth, and how variable parent–son and parent–daughter correlations can be.This article is part of the theme issue ‘The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.

CITE THIS COLLECTION

DataCite
3 Biotech
3D Printing in Medicine
3D Research
3D-Printed Materials and Systems
4OR
AAPG Bulletin
AAPS Open
AAPS PharmSciTech
Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg
ABI Technik (German)
Academic Medicine
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Psychiatry
Academic Questions
Academy of Management Discoveries
Academy of Management Journal
Academy of Management Learning and Education
Academy of Management Perspectives
Academy of Management Proceedings
Academy of Management Review
or
Select your citation style and then place your mouse over the citation text to select it.

SHARE

email

Usage metrics

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

AUTHORS (15)

Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Mary C. Towner
Ryan Baldini
Bret A. Beheim
Samuel Bowles
Heidi Colleran
Michael Gurven
Karen L. Kramer
Siobhán M. Mattison
David A. Nolin
Brooke A. Scelza
Rebecca Sear
Mary K. Shenk
Eckart Voland
John Ziker
need help?