Figures 14 to 25, Normalised mean EMGrms values for the Biceps, Triceps and the Forearm from Fatiguing effects of indirect vibration stimulation in upper limb muscles: pre, post and during isometric contractions superimposed on upper limb vibration

Figures 14-17: Normalised mean EMGrms values for the Biceps for the five consecutive sections of the fatigue effort during the progression of each of the successive four fatiguing exercise efforts performed, under control and vibration condition. Effort 1- CFC1 vs VCF1 (Figure 14), Effort 2- CFC2 vs VCF2 (Figure 15), Effort 3- CFC3 vs VCF3 (Figure 16), and Effort 4- CFC4 vs VCF4 (Figure 17). Figures 18-21: Normalised mean EMGrms values for the Triceps for the five consecutive sections of the fatigue effort during the progression of each of the successive four fatiguing exercise efforts performed, under control and vibration condition. Effort 1- CFC1 vs VCF1 (Figure 18), Effort 2- CFC2 vs VCF2 (Figure 19), Effort 3- CFC3 vs VCF3 (Figure 20), and Effort 4- CFC4 vs VCF4 (Figure 21). Figures 22-25: Normalised mean EMGrms values for the Forearm for the five consecutive sections of the fatigue effort during the progression of each of the successive four fatiguing exercise efforts performed, under control and vibration condition. Effort 1- CFC1 vs VCF1 (Figure 22), Effort 2- CFC2 vs VCF2 (Figure 23), Effort 3- CFC3 vs VCF3 (Figure 24), and Effort 4- CFC4 vs VCF4 (Figure 25).